I wanted to start a thread for this topic as I think it's worth of discussion.
In technical analysis we start off by learning that your winners should be X times your losers. So say that your stop is 30 pips, your target should be 90, which is 3 times. This way with a lower win ratio, over the long run you should be ahead. That's the theory that I've heard anyways.
However, reality it seems is quite different. From different EA results and trading performance, I notice that the successful ones always have a larger stop vs the target and rely on a high win ratio over the long term. I haven't seen an EA that has a small stop, large target and lower win ratio which looks profitable over time but do find the opposite case. When you think about it makes sense that with a higher stop loss and lower target, just by probability, your target has a higher chance of getting hit regardless of how you enter. As for example, if we use a target of 30 and stop of 90, then chances are that the market is more likely to move 30 pips one direction than 90 pips.
So I'd really like to hear your opinions about this topic as which is the best solution for the long term results.
Bookmarks